Thanks to Roger Carlton for this post where he gives his thoughts on the political situation of today.
Roger is columnist for Graham Star newspaper in Robbinsville, NC.
Roger is columnist for Graham Star newspaper in Robbinsville, NC.
 |
| Roger Carlton |
That ant had high hopes and so did a whole bunch of Presidential candidates. In that popular song by Doris Day the ant moved the rubber tree plant because he had high hopes. So what happened to those political high hopes held by so many candidates of promise?
Let's start with the debate debacles: The format was
horrible. Point counterpoint is no way to inform the voting public of the
character of the candidates or the merit of their proposals. Raising your hand
for recognition demeans the office. It is what elementary school students do.
It would have been so much better to give each candidate five minutes to
express their five top problems and solutions. Brief and to the point. Frankly
it means nothing to this writer to hear what one candidate thinks about
another. Would you expect a candidate to say that their opponent's position is
better than their own?
The pundit debate monitors did a terrible job of
focusing the issues and controlling the screechers. Half the debate time spent
on Medicare for all and no questions about climate change and the explosive
growth of mass murder borders on malfeasance by someone who calls themselves a
journalist. In this environment, the candidate with the best one liners seemed
to be heroic to the debate monitors and the candidate with manners and who
followed the rules was labelled weak. Did anyone make their decision on who to
vote for based on debate performance? Doubtful.
The billionaire factor. One candidate spent $250
million starting nearly a year ago with a single message. He was the best
person to beat President Trump. Could you figure out what he would do once
elected? Another candidate spent $500 million in a few weeks telling us his
role as Mayor of New York gave him the credentials to be a good President.
Probably true but his total of 20 minutes of debate performance negated a
lifetime of business, philanthropic and political success.
Please keep one thing in mind. The total primary
expenses through Super Tuesday were nearly $900 million. The money went mostly
to media so this kumatai slugfest was a source of untold profits for the media
moguls and their stockholders. No wonder the Wall Street Journal vilifies one of
the candidates as being a Socialist without explaining what that means. To put
the dollars into perspective more money has been spent so far than the taxable
value of 80 percent of the property in Graham County.
With all due caution to avoid political incorrectness
the gender, gay, racial and religious factors remain top of mind with many
voters. Let's be honest. It took 143 years from the end of the Civil War to
elect an African American President and it has been 100 years since women were
granted the right to vote. While the two remaining candidates don't fit into
the definition of diversity, let us hope that they will select a capable Vice
President running mate who comes from one of the groups that made capable
candidates available but could not put them across the line for the top job.
The
fire in your gut concern.
Many of the candidates had great
resumes but bland personas. Bernie consistently railed against the oligarchs on
Wall Street and the outrageous profits made by the medical companies. He wanted
you to believe that the money changers needed to be thrown out of the
Washington temple and he was the candidate to do that. Joe Biden
said wait a minute. We can't afford all this. He was calm and did not point his
finger at you. All the rest of the candidates fought for a place in the
continuum of recognition by the media and failed to find a sweet spot.
Finally, voters saw through the opposition dirt
researching and did not hold a candidate responsible for some stupid behavior
or slip of the tongue 30 or more years ago. Who among us hasn't said or done
something that they regret. Joe Biden helped his son with getting a lucrative
job for which he was unqualified. Bernie praised some political strongmen with
whom he was enamored many years ago. Has not the current incumbent in the White
House done the same for his children and their spouses? Does he not cotton up
to the current strongmen of the world?
All these factors taken together whittled down a broad
and diverse group of candidates to two old white guys.
Perhaps Darwin's theory
of survival of the fittest best describes the primary process to date. There
are a few more big primaries. It seems that all the debate smoke and mirrors
will now pare down to who has the best chance to beat President Trump. Is that
any different than four years ago when the question was who had the best chance
to beat Hillary Clinton?
